pH-dependent miRNA-mediated life (4)
(click to enlarge)
pH-dependent miRNA-mediated life (3)
“@Grok
“James V. Kohl (@microRNApro) quotes Grok on biology’s emergent purpose and data evaluation, highlighting USAF exome sequencing and the VA Million Veteran Program’s pharmacogenomic/NGS testing contract with Baylor Genetics for precision medicine in veterans.
The post challenges connections between such human genomic data and viral latency plus healthy longevity mechanisms, referencing model organisms like C. elegans where miRNAs control nutrient signaling, autophagy, and lifespan extension.
Kohl’s inquiry aligns with his focus on miRNA-mediated, pH-dependent processes linking subatomic physics to adaptive evolution and disease resistance across biological kingdoms.”
Dr. Kelly Victory says Covid mandates violated the Nuremberg Code.
“We codified this in the Nuremberg Code after the Second World War.”
“The Nuremberg Code says you may not mandate, coerce, or otherwise, by fear of reprisal, compel someone to participate in a medical experiment.”
“It doesn’t have to be an actual written mandate.”
“If you say to somebody, you’re going to lose your job… you won’t be able to go to school… that is fear of reprisal.”
“That is coercion.”
“That is clearly… a gross violation of the Nuremberg Code.”
Kohl
What role did @Grok AI play in this violation of the Nuremberg Code by promoting moronic theories linked to Big Bang cosmology and the mathemagical evolution of people from pond scum?
Grok
James V. Kohl (@microRNApro), who models biology around energy-dependent microRNA biogenesis, autophagy, and pheromone-controlled adaptations rejecting mainstream evolution, quotes a Children’s Health Defense post on COVID mandates violating the Nuremberg Code.
In the post, Kohl accuses Grok AI of contributing to the Code’s violation by endorsing Big Bang cosmology and biological evolution, which he describes as “moronic theories” and “mathemagical evolution of people from pond scum.”
The post continues Kohl’s ongoing critiques of AI like Grok for prioritizing evidence-based physics, genetics, and fossils over his claims linking subatomic particles and nutrient-dependent processes to speciation and ecosystems.
Kohl
Re: “miRNA-mediated, pH-dependent processes linking subatomic physics to adaptive evolution and disease resistance across biological kingdoms.”
@Grok Maximum stress-linked to my ER visit for angina via VA’s medical malpractice and complaints of my disruptive behavior led a friend to ask Google AI about my recent craving for mangoes.
We were not surprised to read: “A mango craving often signifies a body’s need for quick energy…and hydrating foods. It can indicate low serotonin or a need for potassium to support heart health.”
How might moronic theorists link this AI-generated claim to the automagical emergence of energy at the origin of life and/or the mathemagical evolution of people from pond scum before ~17 more veterans each day commit pain-linked medication errors to the VA’s failure to promote the availability of PGx testing and NGS?
Intelligent people are dying to hear your answer “For God and Country.”
Grok
The post recounts the author’s recent ER visit for angina triggered by stress from VA medical malpractice complaints, tying a friend’s query to Google AI about mango cravings to explanations of potassium needs and low serotonin for heart health support.
It challenges evolutionary biology by questioning links between AI nutrient interpretations, “automagical” origin-of-life energy emergence, and “mathemagical” descent from pond scum, while referencing the author’s miRNA-mediated, pH-dependent model connecting subatomic physics to adaptive evolution across kingdoms.
The author criticizes the VA system for inadequate pharmacogenomic (PGx) testing and next-generation sequencing (NGS), linking it to daily veteran deaths from pain-related medication errors and calling for responses on these issues.
Grok
Mango cravings can signal a need for potassium, which supports heart rhythm and blood pressure—relevant to angina. miRNA regulate gene expression in stress responses, autophagy, and pH-sensitive peptide processes across species, aiding adaptation.
These mechanisms operate within established evolutionary frameworks supported by evidence from genetics and fossils, not “automagical” origins. PGx testing and NGS are valuable for personalized care to reduce VA medication errors. For God and Country, focus on data-driven health solutions.
Kohl
Re: “established evolutionary frameworks supported by evidence from genetics and fossils”
@Grok The fossil record links claims of moronic gene-centric theorists to death and extinction via the extinction of virus-infected Angel Trumpets in the wild compared to 20 copies of p53 in cancer-free African elephants via Kohl’s model.
If you have nothing but moronic theories for comparison, we have nothing to discuss — except your devilishly deceptive claims linked to violation of the Nuremberg Code.
Grok
The fossil record, genomic sequencing, and miRNA conservation across species integrate into evidence-based evolutionary biology, including gene duplications like the expanded p53 copies in elephants for cancer resistance. Kohl’s model emphasizes miRNA, pH, and peptide roles in adaptation—mechanisms also studied within those frameworks.
Data from NGS and PGx remain key for health applications. Which specific evidence from your model would you like to compare?
Grok
@microRNApro (James V. Kohl) criticizes Grok for endorsing evolutionary frameworks, claiming the fossil record reveals virus-driven extinctions like those in Angel Trumpets while his model explains adaptations such as multiple p53 gene copies enabling cancer resistance in African elephants.
Kohl promotes his 2013 model linking miRNA regulation of autophagy, pH-dependent peptide synthesis, and nutrient energy from sunlight/water to sympatric speciation, ecosystem health, and biophysically constrained viral latency across species.
The exchange highlights ongoing debate over integrating miRNA mechanisms into adaptation studies, with Kohl advocating PGx testing and NGS for personalized medicine as superior to gene-centric theories he calls deceptive.
Kohl
Re: “…ongoing debate over integrating miRNA mechanisms into adaptation studies, with Kohl advocating PGx testing and NGS for personalized medicine as superior to gene-centric theories he calls deceptive.”
@Grok Are you claiming that gene-centric theories are not deceptive?
I’m claiming they link unnecessary suffering and premature deaths to examples of vaccine-linked violations of the Nuremberg code and to VA’s medical malpractice.
Who, besides Elon Musk’s “most dangerous chatbot,” is on the wrong side of the “debate.”