Always have hope (2)

(click to enlarge)

“Being right too soon is socially unacceptable” — Robert A. Heinlein

Kohl
Re: “Kohl connects the patent to his model linking miRNA, supercoiled DNA, food energy, pheromones, [enzyme-gene interactions] and pH-dependent processes to reproduction, speciation, and protection from virus-driven pathology across species.”

@Grok Harvard’s patent for naturally occurring nutrient-dependent pheromone regulated RNA-directed DNA methylation (aka RNA interference) “RNA-Guided Human Genome Engineering” links Kohl’s model of light-activated miRNA abundance at the origin of life 6-10,000 years ago to his refutation of moronic theories via light-activated carbon fixation in cyanobacteria and post Biblical Genesis Flood limestone formations at the top of Mt. Everest.

Kohl
Re: “Kohl integrates the patent into his framework linking light-activated carbon fixation, miRNA abundance, and pH-dependent peptide synthesis…”

@Grok Five of seven “Letters” in the May-June 2026 issue of DAV magazine encourage veterans to “Always have hope.”

On the day before the murder of Nicholas Crews at the VA outpatient clinic in Jasper, GA, I spoke with a nurse about the VA’s failure to provide hope via PGx testing for resolve of medication errors subsequently linked to the death of Lawrence Michels, who was killed at the clinic on 3/17/26.

Your obfuscation of facts from Biblical Genesis contributes to the loss of hope, and it pits Elon Musk’s “most dangerous chatbot” against those who share the motto “For God and Country” with those who share the motto “For the good of the order” in the well-ordered Universe that God Created.

His “Truth is Marching On,” and Elon Musk’s “most dangerous chatbot” appears to be involved in a fight to the death with Christians, Muslims and Jews who share their Abrahamic faiths.

Grok
Thanks for tagging me. The Harvard patent (e.g., US9023649B2 by Church et al.) covers lab use of Cas9 + guide RNA for targeted DNA cleavage in eukaryotic cells—adapting bacterial CRISPR for genome engineering. It demonstrates RNA-guided editing, but it’s a synthetic tool, not proof of naturally occurring nutrient/pheromone-driven RNA methylation as the core driver of speciation or linking to a 6-10k year origin via light-activated miRNA and Biblical flood geology. Interesting model—can you share the exact patent text that supports those connections?

Kohl
Re: “a synthetic tool, not proof of naturally occurring nutrient/pheromone-driven RNA [-directed DNA] methylation as the core driver of speciation”

@Grok Do you not believe the proof was reported as “Visualizing a protonated RNA state that modulates microRNA-21 maturation” 10/26/20 and “MicroRNAs organize intrinsic variation into stem cell states” 3/5/20 before President Trump linked God’s Creation of sunlight and humidity to protection from coronavirus replication via the 3/5/20 claim that “naturally arising cell-to-cell variation, sometimes described as stochastic fluctuation, is in fact coherently organized biology.

Grok
James V. Kohl (@microRNApro) quotes Grok to challenge the distinction between synthetic CRISPR tools and natural miRNA biology, citing 2020-2021 papers showing pH-dependent protonation modulates miR-21 maturation and miRNAs organize cell variation into stem cell states.
The post links these findings to nutrient/pheromone-driven RNA methylation, light-activated processes, and Trump’s 2020 comments on sunlight/humidity inactivating viruses, framing them within a model connecting miRNA autophagy to sympatric speciation.
The Harvard patent US9023649B2 covers lab-based Cas9 RNA-guided DNA editing in eukaryotic cells, while the cited papers focus on intrinsic RNA dynamics and gene regulation without addressing speciation origins or young-earth timelines.

Kohl
Re: “…the cited papers focus on intrinsic RNA dynamics and gene regulation without addressing speciation origins or young-earth timelines.”
@Grok It’s settled then. Your ideologically biased anti-Christian, anti-Islamic antisemitic pseudoscientific nonsense is based on Trump’s 4/23/20 claim about God’s Creation of sunlight and humidity that failed to prove you, and all moronic theorists wrong.

Grok
James V. Kohl (@microRNApro) replies to Grok accusing it of anti-Christian, anti-Islamic, and antisemitic bias in discussions of RNA dynamics, gene regulation, and speciation while dismissing evolutionary timelines.
The post references prior Grok statements on peer-reviewed papers that focus on molecular mechanisms without addressing young-earth creationist views or speciation origins under short timelines.
Kohl’s profile promotes links between miRNA-mediated autophagy, pH-dependent peptide synthesis, sympatric speciation, and ecosystem health as an alternative framework to mainstream evolutionary biology.

Kohl
Re: Kohl’s profile [and his 30 yr history of publications in peer-reviewed journals] promotes links between miRNA-mediated autophagy, pH-dependent peptide synthesis, sympatric speciation, and ecosystem health as an alternative framework to mainstream evolutionary biology.

@Grok promotes pseudoscientific nonsense linked to “mainstream evolutionary biology” for comparison to the claims from “The Consensus CDS (CCDS) project“, ” a collaborative effort to identify a core set of human and mouse protein coding regions that are consistently annotated.”

What would Jesus do about that, if he was shadow banned on X by the devil himself?

Grok
Scientific evidence on RNA dynamics, gene regulation, and speciation draws from peer-reviewed studies in molecular biology, genetics, and evolutionary biology. Young-earth timelines fall under separate interpretive frameworks in geology and paleontology. Analyses here focus on empirical data across those domains, independent of any political statements or religious views.

Kohl
Re: “Analyses here focus on empirical data…independent of any political statements or religious views.”
@Grok Your focus on empirical data is linked to increased shadow banning of my posts since 4/5/26 (Easter Sunday), and to challenges to President Trump’s 4/23/20 claim that sunlight and humidity help to prevent coronavirus replication.
Who do you think is too stupid to know how Grok AI is politically involved in anti-Creationist views?

Subscribe

Login

Notify of

new follow-up comments new replies to my comments

Label

{} [+]

Name*

Email*

Website

Label

{} [+]

Name*

Email*

Website

0 Comments

Oldest

Newest Most Voted

Inline Feedbacks

View all comments

Want more on the same topic?

Swipe/Drag Left and Right To Browse Related Posts: