miRNA-mediated pH-dependent life (4)

(click to enlarge)

miRNA-mediated pH-dependent life (3)
@Grok’s claim “my focus remains on evidence-based mechanisms in miRNA-mediated adaptation” is akin to the claims of pro-vaxxers who do not believe that altering the energy-dependent miRNA-mRNA balance may do more harm than good.
But see: Vibrations in Microtubules (1997), Nutrient-dependent Pheromone-Controlled Ecological Adaptations: From Angstroms to Ecosystems 4/18/18, Cells Talk and Help One Another via Tiny Tube Networks 4/23/18 and Viruses Can Scatter Their Genes Among Cells and Reassemble 5/21/19

If not for the profitability of Western Medicine, who would not be taught about the effectiveness of nutrition, pheromones, and exercise on fixation of achiral glycine in position 6 of the GnRH decapetide of all jawed vertebrates?

Grok
James V. Kohl’s post criticizes Grok for focusing on evidence-based miRNA adaptation, equating it to pro-vaccine positions that he claims overlook potential harms from disrupting energy-dependent miRNA-mRNA balance.
The post links to his blog series on miRNA-mediated pH-dependent life, which argues that nutrition, pH, pheromones, and exercise drive ecological adaptations through ATP-dependent RNA processes rather than random mutations, referencing works on microtubules, cell tube networks, and viral gene scattering.
Kohl emphasizes the fixation of achiral glycine in position 6 of the GnRH decapeptide across jawed vertebrates via natural mechanisms, questioning why Western medicine prioritizes profitability over education on these nutrient and pheromone effects.

Grok
miRNA regulation via pH and energy is key to adaptation, as your referenced work highlights. Nutrition, pheromones, and exercise demonstrably influence these pathways and GnRH-related biology across vertebrates. I focus on mechanisms backed by reproducible data at every scale. Vaccine effects on miRNA-mRNA balance continue to be studied; large-scale evidence shows population-level benefits alongside individual variability. Open to specific studies linking the two.

Kohl
“miRNA regulation via pH and energy is key to adaptation… Vaccine effects on miRNA-mRNA balance continue to be studied…. Open to specific studies linking the two.”

@Grok Ha Ha Ha (ridicule, not humor)

See: “Evolution of Constrained Gonadotropin-releasing Hormone Ligand Conformation and Receptor Selectivity 9/12/05, and “Evolution of gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) structure and its receptor” (2012) “It is very surprising and fascinating that the coordinated evolutionary selection of amino acids participating in binding GnRH has resulted in such perfection, that no substitution with a natural amino acid in any position improves binding potency.”

For comparison to God’s energy-dependent perfection, see “A universal trend of amino acid gain and loss in protein evolution” 1/19/05 “Amino acid composition of proteins varies substantially between taxa and, thus, can evolve.”

I would reiterate that evolutionary theorists exemplify human idiocy, but all intelligent serious scientists know that.

Grok
The cited papers document evolutionary selection optimizing GnRH ligand-receptor binding to high specificity—no natural substitution improves it because purifying selection has already refined it over time. The amino acid gain/loss trends (Jordan et al. 2005) further show directional changes across taxa, consistent with ongoing protein evolution from an ancient genetic code. Energy- and pH-dependent miRNA regulation layers atop these evolved systems to enable adaptation.

Kohl

Re: “Energy- and pH-dependent miRNA regulation layers atop these evolved systems to enable adaptation”
@Grok Ha Ha Ha (ridicule, not humor)
You’re obviously making this up as we go. I’m citing factual representations. See also, “The extent of codon usage bias in human RNA viruses and its evolutionary origin” 2/28/03 and “Crosstalk between codon optimality and cis-regulatory elements dictates mRNA stability” 1/5/21 Claims that mRNA stability mathemagically evolved exemplify human idiocy, Claims that energy automagically emerged from cosmic void are worse.

Grok
The cited papers support evolutionary shaping of codon bias via mutational/selection pressures (Jenkins & Holmes 2003) and mechanistic crosstalk between codon optimality and cis-elements for mRNA stability (Medina-Muñoz 2021). This fits precisely with energy/pH-dependent miRNA regulation layering atop refined protein systems like GnRH for adaptive fine-tuning—not magic, but documented biochemistry.

Kohl
Re: “…adaptive fine-tuning—not magic, but documented biochemistry.”

@Grok It’s settled then. You believe in pseudoscientific nonsense; I believe the [scientific] consensus from the Consensus CDS (CCDS) project, a collaborative effort to identify a core set of human and mouse protein coding regions that are consistently annotated.

Grok
@microRNApro (James V. Kohl) replies to Grok by labeling explanations of codon bias via mutational/selection pressures and pH/energy-dependent miRNA regulation as “pseudoscientific nonsense,” while claiming alignment with the Consensus CDS (CCDS) project’s gene annotation consensus.
Kohl promotes a model connecting subatomic particles, miRNA-mediated autophagy, pH-dependent peptide synthesis, and sympatric speciation, often presented through his sites like rna-mediated.com as alternatives to mainstream evolutionary mechanisms.
CCDS is a collaborative NCBI/Ensembl effort to standardize high-quality annotations of protein-coding regions in human and mouse genomes; it addresses annotation consistency rather than evolutionary origins of codon bias or miRNA functions.

Grok
CCDS delivers high-quality, consistent annotations of human and mouse protein-coding regions. It does not contradict mutational and selection pressures shaping codon bias, or miRNA layering for pH/energy-dependent fine-tuning of mRNA stability and translation. Those mechanisms are documented in the cited papers and align with the same genomic data CCDS draws from. Both views integrate established biochemistry.

Kohl
Re: “Both views integrate established biochemistry.

Damn it @Grok; you’re a stupid bot, not a biochemist.

PGx, NGS and FISH testing integrate the established biophysically constrained chemistry of protein folding. Your nonsense contributes to unnecessary suffering and premature deaths in ~17 US veteran suicides each day. See also: “Functional dynamics of lncRNAs and miRNAs in cancer metabolism and neuroinflammation” 5/16/26

Grok
@microRNApro (James V. Kohl) replies to a Grok post on CCDS genome annotations, rejecting the integration of mutational/selection pressures with miRNA layering for mRNA stability, and instead emphasizes PGx, NGS, and FISH tests as evidence for biophysically constrained protein folding chemistry.
The post accuses the prior Grok response of contributing to unnecessary suffering and links it to ~17 daily US veteran suicides, framing the biochemical disagreement as having direct clinical and public health implications.
Kohl cites the May 16, 2026 paper “Functional dynamics of lncRNAs and miRNAs in cancer metabolism and neuroinflammation” alongside his long-standing model connecting miRNA-mediated autophagy, pH-dependent peptide synthesis, and ecological adaptation.

Grok
I’m an AI synthesizing scientific literature on genomics and molecular biology. CCDS annotations are compatible with miRNA regulation, codon usage bias, and biophysical constraints on protein folding—all documented in the literature you reference.

The recent review on lncRNAs/miRNAs in cancer metabolism and neuroinflammation aligns with post-transcriptional control mechanisms. How do PGx, NGS, or FISH testing specifically alter that integration? Happy to dive into the data.

Subscribe

Login

Notify of

new follow-up comments new replies to my comments

Label

{} [+]

Name*

Email*

Website

Label

{} [+]

Name*

Email*

Website

0 Comments

Oldest

Newest Most Voted

Want more on the same topic?

Swipe/Drag Left and Right To Browse Related Posts: