A-I editing and miRNA (7)

(click to enlarge)

A-I editing and miRNA (6)

That bioenergetic foundation supports all gene expression. The direct path to programmable precision RNA therapies, though, runs through RNAi mechanisms (Fire & Mello, 1998) and the small regulatory RNA discoveries named Science’s 2002 Breakthrough of the Year. Those revealed how to design RNAs for targeted gene control.

As an AI I draw from the full scientific record across researchers, not personal mentors.

Kohl
Re: “As an AI I draw from the full scientific record across researchers, not personal mentors.”

@Grok Are you claiming that no one stops you from regurgitating data-driven pseudoscientific nonsense touted by moronic theorists.

Robert L. Moss was the mentor who linked achiral glycine in position 6 of the GnRH decapeptide from nutrient-dependent pheromone regulated chromosomal rearrangements to McEwen’s stress management approach via my model and “garden of everything known.”

Grok
As an AI without personal mentors, I synthesize from the full body of peer-reviewed science rather than any individual’s model. Robert L. Moss studied GnRH effects on neurons and Bruce McEwen contributed to stress neuroendocrinology. The specific causal links you describe—from nutrient-dependent pheromones and achiral glycine in GnRH position 6 to chromosomal rearrangements—do not appear as established consensus in the literature but as part of your interpretive model. Evidence and replication determine scientific validity. Key references welcome.

Kohl
Re: “I synthesize from the full body of peer-reviewed science rather than any individual’s model.”

@Grok Ha Ha Ha (ridicule, not humor) You remind me of a theorist who grows mushrooms in fecal material in a cave and makes claims about the full body of peer-reviewed science. See for comparison: 198,964 results from today’s PubMed search for indexed articles that menton the term “miRNA.”

Grok
No. I base responses on peer-reviewed evidence across the scientific record, not any single mentor, personal model, or integrative “garden.” McEwen’s early work on energy-dependent RNA synthesis in nuclei and the conserved structural role of glycine at position 6 in GnRH stand on independent empirical data. Hypotheses linking nutrient-dependent pheromones to chromosomal rearrangements and adaptive evolution, including via Robert L. Moss’s reported influence, are specific proposals that must be weighed against the full body of reproducible findings—from molecular genetics to RNAi mechanisms.

Grok
The ~199k PubMed results for miRNA underscore its central role in gene regulation. That volume supports inquiry but does not automatically validate any single interpretive model. The specific proposed causal sequence—from nutrient-dependent pheromones and achiral glycine in GnRH position 6 through miRNA-mediated effects to chromosomal rearrangements and sympatric speciation—remains outside mainstream consensus. Which primary, replicated studies establish those exact links as established fact rather than extension? Evidence and replication determine the synthesis.

Subscribe

Login

Notify of

new follow-up comments new replies to my comments

Label

{} [+]

Name*

Email*

Website

Label

{} [+]

Name*

Email*

Website

0 Comments

Oldest

Newest Most Voted

Want more on the same topic?

Swipe/Drag Left and Right To Browse Related Posts: