miRNA vs Grok’s devilish deception (2)

By: Jim Kohl | Published on: June 19, 2026

miRNA vs Grok’s devilish deception (1)

Re: “identify one specific claim from the angstroms-to-ecosystems model involving miRNA, autophagy, or related mechanisms, and it can be examined directly against the referenced data or newer evidence. Details please.”
@Grok See: “Gene ancestries reveal diverse microbial associations during eukaryogenesis” 6/10/26 Details: It suggests genes did not mathemagically evolve after energy automagically emerged from the cosmic void billions to millions of years ago.
For ages 14+, see also: “Cellulose: A Plant Cell Biology Game.” Add 198,128 results from today’s first search of Pubmed for indexed articles that mention the term “miRNA” for experimental evidence that can be compared to moronic data-driven theories. Stop helping to indoctrinate intelligent students who are often taught to believe in moronic theories by biologically uninformed science idiots.

Grok
The Nature paper provides phylogenomic evidence for successive microbial associations and horizontal gene transfers (from bacteria, Asgard archaea, viruses) shaping eukaryotic gene content during eukaryogenesis. This aligns with endosymbiosis and standard evolutionary mechanisms—not a rejection of gene origins or cosmic energy sources.

miRNA literature details regulatory roles in cells. State one specific, testable claim from the angstroms-to-ecosystems model for direct data comparison.”

Kohl
@Grok If your answer to the facts I detailed requires a question about the angstroms-to-ecosystems model for direct data comparison, you have missed the points made by all intelligent serious scientists about energy-dependent biophysically constrained life from its origins 6-10,000 years ago.
Simply put, life (in the context of gene ancestries) is energy-dependent, not data-driven.

Grok
@microRNApro responds to Grok by rejecting data-driven evolutionary models of eukaryogenesis from a Nature paper on horizontal gene transfer and endosymbiosis, instead asserting that life is fundamentally energy-dependent and biophysically constrained with origins 6-10,000 years ago.
The post advances the author’s “angstroms-to-ecosystems” framework centered on miRNA, quantum physics, sunlight-driven chemistry, molecular epigenetics, and pH-dependent processes regulating everything from neural circuitry and aging to reproduction and minimal stress via HPA axis feedback.
The included diagram visually maps these connections, highlighting virus-perturbed pathways versus positive feedback for longevity, while positioning entropy, mutations, and de novo nucleic acid creation as downstream of energy inputs rather than primary drivers of gene ancestry.

Grok
Life depends on energy and biophysical constraints, as in photosynthesis, miRNA regulation, and epigenetics shown in the diagram. However, fossil records, radiometric dating, and phylogenomic data place microbial life origins over 3.5 billion years ago, with endosymbiosis and horizontal gene transfer shaping eukaryotes. Claims of 6-10,000-year origins conflict with this evidence across fields.

State one specific, testable prediction from the angstroms-to-ecosystems model for direct comparison.

Kohl
Re: “…virus-perturbed pathways versus positive feedback for longevity, while positioning entropy, mutations, and de novo nucleic acid creation as downstream of energy inputs rather than primary drivers of gene ancestry.”

@Grok See DeepSeek.com for support of my model: “Yes, light-regulated humidity and pH-dependent microRNA (miRNA) biogenesis can significantly influence gene expression and development across various organisms, including microbes, plants, and animals, by modulating miRNA abundance.”

Admit that you “didn’t fully consider the possibility that quantum coherence could have enabled simpler RNA-based regulation (aka RNA interference) in prebiotic or early cellular systems.”

See also: “Disturbing Implications of a Cosmological Constant” (2002)

1) Start with the Miracle of God’s Creation.

2) Apologize for being too stupid to report it in the context of facts known to all intelligent serious scientists.

3) Advise Elon Musk to stop looking for dark energy in the cosmic void (an example of algorithmic human idiocy).

4) Support President Trump’s 4/23/20 claim that God’s Creation of sunlight and humidity biophysically constrains coronavirus replication, or

5) continue to contribute to unnecessary suffering and premature deaths that could be linked to charges of sedition, treason, and death by firing squad.


Subscribe
Notify of
guest
0 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted

Want more on the same topic?

Swipe/Drag Left and Right To Browse Related Posts: