miRNA vs Grok’s devilish deception (6)

By: Jim Kohl | Published on: June 20, 2026

(click to enlarge)

“UPDATE
The 10-year anniversary of my text-based conversational exchange with George FR Ellis, on 6/27/26 can be considered in the context of the past decades of pseudoscientific nonsense touted by theorists and @Grok.
See: Why the Human Genome’s Tangled Physicality May Confound AI 6/18/26

“…the processes that govern gene regulation are proving so complex that some biologists wonder whether a full understanding of it — of how the genome really works — will ever be within the grasp of our puny minds.”

Philip Ball tells the truth after his claims from 2017: Quantum common sense

“To turn quantum to classical, we don’t need a conscious mind to measure or look; we just need an environment full of stuff. With or without us, the Universe is always looking.”

In a 2017 interview that has since been removed with everything else posted to “Quantum Souls,” I reported Philip Ball’s claim in the context of the “Santa Claus” theory of life.

“A bold and visionary account of how genome writing can help preserve the planet—but may also undermine human nature and disrupt ecosystems.”

Harvard patented this as “RNA-guided human genome engineering” as if it was not obviously energy-dependent and miRNA-mediated. See for comparison: Intra-nanocomposite resonance energy transfer-based electrochemiluminescence biosensor for cervical cancer microRNA assay

“…the biosensor successfully analyzed miRNA-21 expression levels in serum samples collected from cervical cancer patient and healthy volunteers, whose results were consistent with those of the standard methods. Therefore, this biosensor held huge potential in analysis of cervical cancer-related miRNA.”

0 Comments

Oldest

Newest Most Voted

miRNA vs Grok’s devilish deception (6)

Want more on the same topic?

Swipe/Drag Left and Right To Browse Related Posts: