miRNA abundance tunes cosmological constants (6)

By: Jim Kohl | Published on: July 18, 2026

miRNA abundance tunes cosmological constants (5) “Nutrient deficiencies, such as insufficient intake of vitamins and minerals, can disrupt DNA methylation, histone modifications, and ncRNA expression, affecting gene regulation related to inflammation, immune function, and metabolism. These changes emphasize the need for balanced nutrition to maintain epigenetic stability and prevent chronic diseases. The balance is energy-dependent; viruses steal the energy. The facts are not linked to the automagical emergence of energy from the cosmic void or mathemagical evolution of people from pond scum. Thus, Elon Musk’s “most dangerous chatbot” appears to be at war with the USA.

Marco Antonio with 35 followers who is following 311 instead of the extant literature on miRNA-mediated fine tuning of cosmological constants wrote:

James Kohl °Your joke attempts to fuse the biblical account of creation with modern biophysical terminology, but in doing so it commits an epistemic illegitimacy that I must point out with full scientific precision! it is true that the genesis account mentions a creation of light on the first day and a separation between day and night on the fourth day by means of luminaries, and it is true that in biophysics there are innumerable processes regulated by ph gradients, from mitochondrial oxidative phosphorylation to protein folding; however, it is entirely fictitious to claim that there exists a causal or explanatory link between both domains, because the biblical account belongs to the realm of theology and wisdom literature of the unwanted ancient east, which does not employ scientific categories, does not formulate testable hypotheses about electromagnetic spectra or ph homeostasis, and lacks any material mechanism that would allow deducing from the narrative of invisible light an organizing principle of the allostatic regulation of living organisms! to force a connection such as “the creation of invisible light on day 1 linked to ph-dependent biophysical constraints” is an example of textual concordism that takes modern scientific terms and arbitrarily superimposes them onto an ancient text that does not even handle the concept of ph introduced by sørensen in 1909, building a pseudoscience that does not satisfy even the slightest standard of falsifiability or empirical support·· therefore, to correct and situate your joke, I remind you that science and theology are distinct narratives with distinct methods, and that none of the findings of mitochondrial biophysics that picard discusses requires or benefits from being linked to the book of genesis to be validated; to pretend that the order of creation is an explanatory framework for the dynamics of cellular ph is as unscientific as attempting to calculate the acceleration of gravity from a psalm.

See for comparison: Dynamics-enhanced molecular property prediction guided by deep learning 7/16/26
This was reported on 7/18/26: “By integrating molecular dynamics with deep learning, the authors demonstrate a scalable route toward more accurate predictions of toxicity, binding, and other molecular properties, bringing computational models closer to the dynamic reality of chemistry and biology”
Does it end the pseudoscientific nonsense touted by moronic theorists, exemplified by @Grok and regurgitated by Marco Antonio?


Subscribe
Notify of
guest
0 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted

Want more on the same topic?

Swipe/Drag Left and Right To Browse Related Posts: